Iꜥjāz al-Quran Dan Konsep Kesepadanan Dalam Terjemahan: Penelitian Dari Pandangan Sarjana Barat Dan Muslim
Iꜥjāz Al-Quran And The Concept Of Equivalence In Translation: Studies From Western And Muslim Perspectives
Keywords:
Iꜥjāz, Kesepadanan Terjemahan, Kebolehterjemahan, Terjemahan al-Quran, Teks AsalAbstract
Malaysian authorities, especially the Ministry of Home Affairs (KDN) have set specific or standard requirements for any publication of the translation of Quranic meanings to include copies of original texts. This is due to a number of attempts to bring out a translation of the Quran without the Arabic text. In order to identify the significant presence of the original Arabic text of the Quran, hence the study will be focused through the views of Islamic and Western scholars on the concept of equivalence as was defined by Nida (1964) and Catford (1965). The study was conducted based on the descriptive analysis through the views of various modern translation scholars and early Islamic scholars on the concept of meaning. The survey found that eventhought Islamic scholars have not discuss the subject of translatability in detailed as was done by western scholars, however, it can be summarized that the views of Muslim scholars as al-Jahiz (1965) and Ibn Qutaibah (1973) since the 8th century is consistent with the general concept of equivalence that developed by Western scholars. The studies suggest in the process of translating, the translator should make an effort to understand the source text first before moving into a target text. Besides capturing the maximum possibilities of the features of the target language.
Abstrak
Badan berautoriti Malaysia khususnya Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) telah menetapkan syarat khusus kepada mana-mana penerbitan terjemahan al-Quran untuk menyertakan bersama salinan teks asal al-Quran. Ini ekoran muncul beberapa usaha untuk menerbitkan terjemahan al-Quran tanpa teks asal bahasa Arab. Bagi mengenal pasti signifikan keberadaan teks asal al-Quran tersebut, maka kajian akan membuat tinjaun kepada pandangan sarjana Islam dan Barat terhadap konsep kesepadanan makna dalam terjemahan sebagai mana yang telah didefinisikan oleh Nida (1964) dan Catford (1965). Bentuk kajian menjurus kepada bentuk analisis deskriptif terhadap pandangan sarjana terjemahan moden dan sarjana awal Islam tentang konsep makna dalam terjemahan. Hasil tinjauan mendapati bahawa walaupun para sarjana Islam tidak membincangkan soal kebolehterjemahan secara menyeluruh sebagaimana yang dilakukan oleh sarjana barat, namun boleh dirumuskan bahawa pandangan cendekiawan muslim seperti al-Jahiz (1965) dan Ibn Qutaibah (1973) sedari kurun ke-8 adalah bertepatan dengan maksud umum kesepadanan terjemahan yang dibina Barat. Kajian menyarankan dalam proses penterjemahan al-Quran, penterjemah seharusnya berusaha sedaya upaya untuk memahami teks asal terlebih dahulu sebelum memindahkan ke dalam sesuatu teks sasaran. Di samping memanfaatkan semaksima mungkin ciri-ciri bahasa sasaran tersebut.
Downloads
References
Abdul-Raof, H. (2001). Qur’an Translation: Discourse, Texture and Exegesis (Cet.1, Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2002.0008
Adab, B. J. (Beverly J. (1996). Annotated Texts for Translation?: English-French. Multilingual Matters.
Akmal Khuzairy. (2016). Perbezaan Status Terjemahan Al-Quran Berbanding Dengan Teks Asalnya Dari Perspektif Pengkajian Terjemahan Moden. Jurnal Penterjemah, 19(2), 19–39.
Al-Jahiz, A. U. amru. (1965). Kit?b al-Hayaw?n (Cet. 2; A. S. Muhammad Harun, ed.). Mustafha al-Halabi.
Al-Qurthubi, M. (2006). al-J?mi’ li-Ahk?m al-Quran (Cet.1; A. Abdullah, ed.). Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.
Al-Shatibi, I. bin M. (1997). al-Muw?faq?t (Abu Ubaidah, ed.). Dar Ibn Affan.
Al-Tahanawi, A. (1996). Mawsu’ah Kashshaf Istilah al-Funun wa al-‘Ulum. Lubnan: Maktabah Lubnan.
Al-Zarkasyi, B. M. (1990). Al-Burh?n f? Ul?m al-Qur?n (Cet. 3; M. A. F. Ibarahim, ed.). Qaherah: Dar al-Turath.
Aldahesh, A. Y. (2014). (Un)Translatability of the Qur’?n A Theoretical Perspective.pdf. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(6), 23–45.
Bassnett-McGuire, S. (1992). Review Translation Studies. In Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies (Revised Ed, Vol. 0).
Bassnett, S. (2002). Translation studies (Cet.3). London and New York: Routledge.
Beaugrande, R. de. (1979). Factors in a Theory of Poetic Translating. Equivalences, 10(3), 92–94.
Bell, R. T. (1991). Translation and Translating- Theory and Practice. In Ann.Oto Laryng. (Cet.2, Vol. 91). Singapore: (Pte) Ltd.
Bernama. (2014, November 19). Terjemahan Al-Quran Tanpa Ayat Asal Diharamkan - Harussani. Astro Awani Online. Retrieved from http://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/terjemahan-al-quran-tanpa-ayat-asal-diharamkan-harussani-48691
Bernama. (2016). KDN akan tubuh Jawatankuasa Penyemakan dan Penilaian Hadis - Ahmad Zahid. Bernama News.
Catford, J. . (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.
Chatzitheodorou, I. (2001). Bible Translation. Translation Journal, 5(4).
de Pedro, R. (1999). The Translatability of Texts: A Historical Overview. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs, 44(4), 546. https://doi.org/10.7202/003808ar
de Waard, J. ., & Nida, E. A. (Eugene A. (1986). From one language to another?: functional equivalence in Bible translating.
El-hadary, T. H. (2008). Equivalence and Translatability of Qur’anic nic Discourse: A Comparative and Analytical Evaluation. University of Leeds, School of Modern Languages and Cultures.
Ghanooni, A. R. (2012). A Review of the History of Translation Studies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.1.77-85
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1992). Discourse and the Translator. London and New York: Longman.
Hisham Hariz, S. M. (2006). Na?ar?t min al-I?j?z al-Bay?n? f? al-Qur’?n al-Kar?m. Ammar-Jordan: Dar al-Syuruq.
House, J. (1977). Translation Quality Assessment. Tubingen?: TBL-Verlag Narr.
Ibn Qutaibah. (1973). Ta’w?l Mushkil al-Qur’an (Cet.2; As said Ahmad Saqr, Ed.). Kaherah: Maktabah Ibn Qutaibah.
JAKIM. (2017). Pandangan hukum yang diputuskan di peringkat Jawatankuasa Muzakarah MKI dan Jawatankuasa Kuasa Fatwa Negeri-Negeri. Retrieved from e-Sumber Maklumat Fatwa website: http://e-smaf.islam.gov.my/e-smaf/index.php/main/mainv1/fatwa/3
Jakobson, R. (2000). On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In L. Venuti (Ed.), The translation studies reader (cet. 1, pp. 113–118). London and New York: Routledge.
Kade, O. (1968). Zufall und Gesetzma?ßigkeit in der U?bersetzung. Leipzig: Verl. Enzyklopa?die.
Khalaf, M. H. (2016). Translation of Explicit Quranic Proverbs and Their Rhetorics Into English. Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Koller, W. (1983). Einfu?hrung in die U?bersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
Kuepper, K. J. (1977). Literary Translation and the Problem of Equivalency. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs, 22(4), 243. https://doi.org/10.7202/003357ar
Larson, M. L. (1984). Meaning-Based Translation: a Guide to cross- language equivalence. New York: University Press of Amerika.
Leal, A., & Snell-Hornby, M. (2013). Book Review: Lynne Long (ed.) Translation and Religion: Holy Untranslatable? Across Languages and Cultures, 14(1), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1556/acr.14.2013.1.7
Leonardi, V. (2000). Equivalence in Translation: Between Myth and Reality. Translation Journal, 4(4), 1–11.
Lotfipour-Saedi, K. (1990). Discourse Analysis and the Problem of Translation Equivalence. Meta: Journal Des Traducteurs, 35(2), 389–397.
Mohd Bakhir Abdullah. (1999). al-Tarjamah min al-Lughah al-?Arabiyyah ila al-Lughah al-M?liziyyah; Ba?d al-I?tib?r?t al-Lughawiyyah. Prosiding Persidangan Penterjemahan Antarabangsa Ke- 7, 403–418. Kuala Lumpur: Persatuan Penterjemah Malaysia.
Munday, J. (2008). Introducing Translation Studies: Theories And Applications (Cet.2). London and New York: Routledge.
Neubert, A. (1985). Text and translation. Leipzig.
Neubert, A., & Shreve, G. M. (1992). Translation as text. Kent State University Press.
Newmark, P. (1981). Approaches to Translation Newmark. Oxford: Permagon Press Ltd.
Newmark, P. (1991). About translation. Sydney: Multilingual Matters.
Newmark, P. (1994). Pendekatan Penterjemahan (Terjemahan Zainab Ahmad & Zaiton AB. Rahman, Ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill.
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1982). The Theory and Practice of Translation (Cet.2). Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Nord, C. (2005). Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-oriented Text Analysis (Cet.2). Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi.
Panou, D. (2013). Equivalence in Translation Theories: A Critical Evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.1.1-6
Rosmalis Anuar. (2017). KDN keluar perintah larangan 22 penerbitan. Bernama News.
Snell-Hornby, M. (1995). Translation Studies: An integrated approach. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.38
Syed Arabi Idid. (2002). Kaedah Penyelidikan Komunikasi dan Sains Sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Syed Nurulakla Syed Abdulllah. (2013). A Workshop on ‘Translation for Amateurs’ – A case Study. International Conference on Translation, & Asian Translators’ Forum, 11.
Syukri Yahya. (2014, November 19). Wujud Cubaan Terjemah al-Quran Hanya dalam Bahasa Melayu. Utusan Online. Retrieved from http://www.utusan.com.my/berita/nasional/wujud-cubaan-terjemah-al-quran-hanya-dalam-bahasa-melayu-1.26482
Venuti, L. (2000). The Translation Studies Reader (Cet.1). London and New York: Routledge.
Wilss, W. (1982). The Science of Translation: Problems and Method. Tubingen: Narr.
Yinhua, X. (2011). Equivalence in Translation: Features and Necessity. In International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (Vol. 1).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
